Thousands of reports of cloud seeding and cloud creation were made on social media by concerned Australians prior to the March 2022 flooding along the east coast of Australia. More recent sightings indicating geoengineering have been recorded, with evidence being sent to Senator Malcolm Roberts, who has put out the call for submissions of, Evidence on Cloud Seeding required for questions to be asked – Malcolm Roberts (malcolmrobertsqld.com.au) Finally, an Australian politician is listening to the people he represents and asking the questions that so many have about what is going on with our weather.
The Australian Government signed up to The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC in 2016 and in doing so agreed to undertake climate change mitigation to slow down the apparent global warming that it claims is taking place. Cloud Seeding Technologies – Mitigate the effects of adverse weather! (cloud-seeding-technologies.com) is an article supporting increased rainfall to cool the planet.
Another climate change mitigation technique that is heavily financed by billionaire Bill Gates is SCoPEx, the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment according to the article – A Bill Gates Venture Aims To Spray Dust Into The Atmosphere To Block The Sun. What Could Go Wrong? (forbes.com) Many concerned citizens agree that a lot can go wrong with this ‘experiment’ and question whether we should be trusting the opinions and beliefs of a computer software billionaire who also has great influence over the education sector, mainstream media and the agricultural and pharmaceutical industries.
But considerations of the big picture, including, The Risks, Rewards and Possible Ramifications of Geoengineering Earth’s Climate need to be discussed, especially by the climate change alarmists. All effects of human activities on our environment must be examined in the ‘climate change debate’. This image recommending the use of aerosols, formerly blamed for partially destroying the ozone layer, is taken from the above March 2019 Smithsonian Magazine article –
One possible method of cooling the planet would involve releasing aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight. A group of Harvard researchers wants to research this concept by studying a very small amount of calcium carbonate using a high-altitude balloon. Harvard University
Mainstream media claims that the floods are proof that our climate is changing due to the damage done by burning fossil fuels, with no mention of the geoengineering and climate change mitigation that is obviously taking place. The Climate Council, Australia’s leading climate change communications non-profit organisation, (led by Tim Flannery), published Everything you need to know about floods and climate change | Explainer | Climate Council in March 2022. It claims that extra heat in our atmosphere is creating more energy for weather systems and that the resulting climate change is affecting our water cycle with wet areas getting wetter, and dry areas becoming drier. This is, in fact, a well-known adverse reaction to cloud seeding and other geoengineering practices, leading to floods in some locations and droughts in others. Important questions raised about the safety of cloud seeding in this article, Is Cloud Seeding Harmful (ranches.org) indicate numerous environmental and health concerns.
The next question then is, why would our authorities want to change our climate and blame it on the use of fossil fuels? To find the answer, one just needs to follow the money, with the renewable energy market now worth eye-watering amounts. This article forecasts that it will cost the US $100 trillion of cumulative investment in the global energy sector up to the year 2050 to transition to renewables. More than a quarry: How Australia can grab a share of $100 trillion in new global landscape | RenewEconomy
Another aspect of the big ‘Great Reset’ picture is the bankrupting of countries under pressure of moving to ‘sustainable’ energy and agricultural practices with the obvious example being Sri Lanka this year. The article, From Sri Lanka to Salinas: Will California Learn Anything from Sri Lanka’s Green Apocalypse? – California Globe shows how strict green policies introduced in 2020 limiting fossil fuels and fertilisers damaged the country’s economy, as detailed in the article, Sri Lanka’s inflation rate surges to 70.2% in August (msn.com) 2022. Consequently, the country is no longer able to produce enough food to feed its people and has had to import it. The United Nations has now stepped in with UN appeals for expertise and resources to help Sri Lanka | Colombo Gazette. This is a classic example of economic manipulation using the problem, reaction, and solution mechanisms to control countries externally.
The picture widens as farmers in many parts of the world protest similar legislative changes due to their governments’ implementation of overreach with respect to renewable energy and extreme agricultural rules. Why Dutch farmers are protesting over emissions cuts – BBC News explains that their government is attempting to force them to cut livestock numbers and reduce their farm production, which will in turn destroy their livelihoods. Aside from that, these strict environmental policies are threatening the world’s food security, as the Netherlands is the second largest exporter of food in the world.
It is believed that the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investor rating for the world is behind these governments introducing such strict legislation. The World Economic Forum Releases Framework to Help Business Identify ESG Factors for Long-Term Resilience > Press releases | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) in 2020. The framework stipulates –
1. Hyper-transparency of corporate practices in the Fourth Industrial Revolution
2. Escalating stakeholder activism fuelled by social media
3. Changing societal expectations in the new age of stakeholder activism
4. Growing investor focus on sustainability issues
Terminology such as the Fourth Industrial Revolution implies a society that is driven by advances in digital technology, including the internet of things, artificial intelligence and 3D printing. Stakeholder activism refers to shareholders communicating their right to have a say in how the company is run. This infers that companies are going to be punished by other companies and woke consumers for not following the climate change agenda. Other major non-government organisations, like BlackRock (the $10 trillion asset management fund), are treating ‘sustainability’ and its related ESG rating as a type of bond rating that has become an integral part of their investment strategy. It is ultimately being used to pressure governments and other organisations to comply with the ESG ideology, otherwise, they will lose business.
It seems that these WEF policies will ultimately be a front for socialism where private property is not allowed and people are bullied into following a set of rules set by the ‘expert’ elite, as exposed in – WEF: Private Property And Privacy Will Vanish By 2030 (technocracy.news) The founder of the WEF has openly bragged about the infiltration of its Young Global Leaders into the world’s governments, including into Australia. World Leaders such as New Zealand PM Jacinda Adern, Canada PM Justin Trudeau and President of France Emmanuel Macron were all WEF Young Global Leaders. Australia’s former Minster for Health and Aged Care Greg Hunt also went through the school for The Forum of Young Global Leaders.
So, it is not surprising that all of these governments are implementing WEF policies such as ESG, Digital ID and Digital Currency. (Why is the Reserve Bank of Australia exploring digital currency options? | Australian economy | The Guardian). The relatively few in Australia who have heard of the proposed Trusted Digital Identity Bill 2021 are asking What is the Digital Identity Bill? – Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. The answer is that it is a piece of legislation designed to act as the framework for a permanent and expansive ‘digital identity’ for all Australian citizens. It will act as a master ID, joining together previously disconnected government databases containing confidential personal information. This raises questions about the safety of citizens’ personal data kept in one place. Senator Alex Antic is another Australian politician who warns about the bigger picture in Australia: Trusted Digital Identity Bill would lay foundations for social credit system – Totality of Evidence and Digital ID – surveillance – Totality of Evidence. The Senator has said that it will lay the foundations for a government-controlled central information database for every Australian. This could lead to a social credit-style system that will forever change the fabric of our society.
Ultimately, we must ask questions about the push for this digital age, especially after what we in Australia have experienced over the last 2 years with so many of our freedoms being lost. Our governments gained a level of control never seen before and many believe that it is just the beginning of such oppression. The push for everyone to switch their petrol or diesel cars to EVs will also fit comfortably with the Digital ID and social credit system. How far and where you travel could then be controlled by authoritarian governments, who believe they know what is best for the environment. Meanwhile, research into EVs shows that the exponential rise in mining needed to produce the batteries for millions of EVs will significantly damage our environment. Unless of course, only the wealthy and chosen few are allowed to drive. The Trusted Digital ID, Digital Currency and ESG are all WEF policies proposed under the guise of creating a safer, sustainable, and resilient world.
It is predicted that the ‘Great Reset’ will kick off with an economic collapse in the very near future. Again, we will be confronted with the creation of a problem, a choreographed reaction and then a well-planned solution that results in everyone having a Digital ID. This Digital ID can then be used to control every single person: what they can buy, how much energy they can use, and where they can go. People can potentially be penalised for any behaviour that is deemed inappropriate or against government policies. Thousands of Australians have been protesting, against this agenda and have been working on ways to counteract the negative impact of these policies. Our Australian way of life is under threat from the foreign ‘Great Reset’ and its citizens are not going to give up their freedoms without a fight.